Child-Pugh Score Calculator

Classifies severity of cirrhosis and estimates hepatic functional reserve. Used to guide prognosis, surgical risk stratification, and transplant listing prioritisation.

Calculate Child-Pugh Score

Select the appropriate value for each of the five clinical and laboratory parameters below. The score is intended for patients with known or suspected cirrhosis and should be interpreted alongside the full clinical picture.

mg/dL · Normal: 0.1–1.2
g/dL · Normal: 3.5–5.5
Ratio · Normal: 0.8–1.2

Clinical or imaging assessment
West Haven criteria
Class A (5–6) Class B (7–9) Class C (10–15)
Important

The Child-Pugh score is a prognostic estimation tool — it does not replace comprehensive hepatological assessment. Two patients with identical scores may have markedly different clinical trajectories depending on aetiology, comorbidities, and response to treatment.

Understanding the Child-Pugh Score

The Child-Pugh classification system estimates the prognosis of chronic liver disease, primarily cirrhosis. Originally developed by Child and Turcotte in 1964 to predict surgical mortality in patients with portal hypertension, the score was later modified by Pugh in 1973, replacing the nutritional status parameter with prothrombin time to improve objectivity.

The system assesses five variables — three laboratory values (total bilirubin, serum albumin, INR) and two clinical findings (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy). Each parameter is scored from 1 to 3 points, yielding a total range of 5–15 points that maps to three functional classes (A, B, C).

Scoring Formula

Total Score = Bilirubin points + Albumin points + INR points + Ascites points + Encephalopathy points

Each parameter: 1–3 points
Total range: 5–15 points
Class A: 5–6 · Class B: 7–9 · Class C: 10–15

Worked Example

A patient with bilirubin 2.5 mg/dL (2 pts), albumin 3.0 g/dL (2 pts), INR 1.5 (1 pt), mild ascites (2 pts), and no encephalopathy (1 pt):

Total = 2 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 8 → Class B

Key distinction: The Child-Pugh score is primarily used for prognostic classification and surgical risk, whereas the MELD score (which does not include subjective variables) is preferred for organ allocation and transplant listing prioritisation in most jurisdictions.

Child-Pugh Classification & Prognosis

The three Child-Pugh classes carry distinct prognostic implications for survival, perioperative mortality, and candidacy for interventions. The following table summarises the key data from the original validation studies and subsequent large cohort analyses.

ClassScoreSeverity1-Year Survival2-Year SurvivalPerioperative Mortality
A5–6Well-compensated~95%~85%~10%
B7–9Significant functional compromise~80%~60%~30%
C10–15Decompensated~45%~35%~80%
Clinical Pearl

A common error is treating Child-Pugh Class B as a single homogeneous group. A score of 7 (lower Class B) carries a substantially better prognosis than a score of 9 (upper Class B). When making surgical or procedural decisions, consider the individual point total rather than the class alone.

Clinical Applications & Parameter Guidance

Each of the five Child-Pugh parameters reflects a different dimension of hepatic function. Understanding the pathophysiology behind each component helps clinicians interpret borderline scores and anticipate clinical trajectories.

Bilirubin reflects the liver’s ability to conjugate and excrete haem breakdown products. In cirrhosis, progressive hepatocyte loss and intrahepatic shunting impair bilirubin clearance. Rising bilirubin is one of the most reliable markers of deteriorating hepatic function.

Important caveats: Gilbert syndrome (present in ~5–10% of the population) can elevate unconjugated bilirubin without hepatic impairment. Haemolysis, biliary obstruction, and sepsis can also raise bilirubin independently of cirrhosis severity. In primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), modified Child-Pugh cut-offs have been proposed because cholestatic disease causes disproportionate bilirubin elevation relative to hepatocellular function.

Albumin is produced exclusively by the liver, with a half-life of approximately 20 days. It is the most abundant plasma protein and is essential for maintaining oncotic pressure and transporting hormones, drugs, and bilirubin. In cirrhosis, falling albumin levels reflect diminishing synthetic capacity.

However, albumin is a negative acute-phase reactant — it falls in any inflammatory state, malnutrition, nephrotic syndrome, and protein-losing enteropathy. Exogenous albumin infusions (commonly given in cirrhosis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or large-volume paracentesis) will transiently raise levels and may artificially improve the Child-Pugh score without reflecting true hepatic improvement.

The liver synthesises most clotting factors (I, II, V, VII, IX, X, XI, XII) and anticoagulant proteins (protein C, protein S, antithrombin). INR prolongation in cirrhosis reflects reduced production of the vitamin K-dependent factors (II, VII, IX, X). Factor VII has the shortest half-life (~6 hours), making INR an early marker of acute hepatic decompensation.

Key confounders include warfarin or direct oral anticoagulant use (which invalidates INR as a liver function marker), vitamin K deficiency (common in cholestatic disease and malnutrition), disseminated intravascular coagulation, and congenital coagulopathies. When anticoagulants are in use, INR cannot be reliably incorporated into the Child-Pugh score.

Ascites results from portal hypertension, splanchnic vasodilation, sodium retention, and reduced oncotic pressure in cirrhosis. Its presence indicates significant decompensation. Ascites grading in the Child-Pugh system divides into absent, mild/controlled (responsive to diuretics), and moderate-to-severe/refractory.

The subjective nature of ascites assessment is a recognised limitation of the score. Ascites can be masked by effective diuretic therapy, and the distinction between “mild” and “moderate-to-severe” varies between observers. Imaging (ultrasound) provides more objective quantification. Refractory ascites — defined as non-responsive to maximal diuretic therapy or recurrence within four weeks of large-volume paracentesis — carries a particularly poor prognosis with median survival of approximately six months.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) results from the accumulation of neurotoxins — primarily ammonia — due to impaired hepatic clearance and portosystemic shunting. The West Haven classification grades HE from I (mild confusion, sleep disturbance) through IV (coma). For Child-Pugh scoring, grades I–II count as 2 points and grades III–IV as 3 points.

HE grading is the most subjective of the five Child-Pugh parameters. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (detected only by psychometric testing) is not captured by the score, yet may affect quality of life and driving fitness. Precipitants such as infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, constipation, electrolyte disturbance, and sedative medications can worsen HE independently of underlying liver disease severity. Always identify and treat reversible triggers before attributing HE grade to baseline hepatic function.

Bedside Approach

When scoring a patient, assess the baseline state — not the acute decompensation. A patient admitted with variceal bleeding and worsened encephalopathy should ideally be scored once stabilised, or their pre-admission baseline should be documented separately. Scoring during an acute event may overestimate chronic disease severity.

Special Populations & Considerations

The Child-Pugh score was originally validated in adult patients with alcoholic cirrhosis undergoing portosystemic shunt surgery. Its applicability varies across different clinical settings and patient populations.

🔬
Cholestatic Liver Disease
In PBC and PSC, bilirubin rises disproportionately relative to other markers of hepatic function. Some centres use modified Child-Pugh criteria with higher bilirubin thresholds for cholestatic aetiologies. The Mayo Risk Score is often preferred for prognostication in PBC.
💊
Patients on Anticoagulation
Warfarin, heparin, and DOACs artificially prolong INR, making the coagulation component unreliable. When INR is confounded by anticoagulant therapy, clinicians should note this limitation and consider using the MELD-Na score (which also uses INR but can be adjusted) or clinical judgement for that parameter.
🏥
Pre-Transplant Assessment
While Child-Pugh Class C (or B with complications) supports transplant candidacy, the MELD score is the primary tool for organ allocation in most jurisdictions. Child-Pugh remains useful for surgical planning, prognostic discussions, and dose adjustment of hepatically metabolised medications.
👶
Paediatric Patients
The Child-Pugh score is not validated in children. Paediatric hepatology uses the Paediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) score for transplant allocation in patients under 12 years of age. Normal ranges for bilirubin, albumin, and INR differ by age, and direct application of adult thresholds is inappropriate.

Drug dosing in cirrhosis: The Child-Pugh classification is widely referenced in drug prescribing information for hepatic dose adjustments. Many drug labels specify dose reductions or contraindications for Class B or C. Always check the specific product monograph — not all medications use Child-Pugh uniformly.

Common Pitfalls & Limitations

The Child-Pugh score, despite its longevity and widespread use, has well-recognised limitations that clinicians should account for when applying it in practice.

Two of the five parameters — ascites and hepatic encephalopathy — rely on clinical judgement rather than objective laboratory values. Inter-observer variability in grading these parameters is significant. One clinician may grade diuretic-responsive ascites as “mild” while another considers it “moderate.” Similarly, the distinction between West Haven grade I and grade II encephalopathy is notoriously inconsistent.

This subjectivity means the same patient may receive different Child-Pugh scores from different assessors. This is one of the principal reasons the MELD score (which uses only objective laboratory values) was adopted for transplant organ allocation.

The Child-Pugh score has a maximum of 15 points, and Class C spans 10–15. A patient scoring 10 (early decompensation) has a meaningfully different prognosis from one scoring 15 (severe multi-organ failure), yet both are categorised as Class C. The score lacks granularity at the sickest end of the spectrum.

For patients in the Class C range, the MELD score provides better discrimination because it is a continuous variable without a ceiling. This is particularly important for transplant prioritisation, where the difference between a MELD of 25 and 40 is clinically critical but would not be captured by Child-Pugh alone.

The Child-Pugh score is designed to reflect chronic hepatic function, not acute illness severity. Scoring a patient during an episode of variceal bleeding, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, or acute-on-chronic liver failure will overestimate their baseline disease severity. Bilirubin and INR may be transiently worsened, ascites may be newly tense, and encephalopathy may be precipitated by reversible factors.

Best practice is to score patients at their clinical baseline or after stabilisation of an acute event. If the score is needed urgently (e.g., for surgical risk assessment during an acute admission), document clearly that it was obtained during a decompensation episode and may not reflect the chronic state.

The Child-Pugh score treats all cirrhosis aetiologies equally, despite well-documented differences in prognosis. Alcoholic cirrhosis with ongoing drinking carries a worse trajectory than hepatitis C-related cirrhosis that has achieved sustained virological response, even at the same Child-Pugh class. Similarly, the score does not incorporate renal function — hepatorenal syndrome is a powerful negative prognostic indicator that Child-Pugh ignores.

The MELD score partially addresses this by including creatinine, but neither score captures aetiology-specific prognosis. Consider the complete clinical picture, including the underlying cause of cirrhosis and its treatability, when counselling patients.

Therapeutic interventions can improve individual Child-Pugh components without necessarily improving the underlying hepatic function. Albumin infusions raise serum albumin, diuretics reduce ascites, lactulose and rifaximin improve encephalopathy grading, and vitamin K supplementation can partially correct INR. A patient receiving aggressive supportive care may score as Class A or B while their underlying liver disease remains severe.

When using Child-Pugh for surgical risk or transplant discussions, consider whether the current score reflects native liver function or treatment-augmented values. Documenting both the “on treatment” and estimated “off treatment” class can be clinically useful.

Quick Reference Summary

5–15 Score Range
(5 parameters × 1–3 pts)
~95% Class A
1-Year Survival
~45% Class C
1-Year Survival
~80% Class C
Perioperative Mortality
Parameter1 Point2 Points3 Points
Total Bilirubin (mg/dL)< 22–3> 3
Serum Albumin (g/dL)> 3.52.8–3.5< 2.8
INR< 1.71.7–2.3> 2.3
AscitesNoneMild / ControlledModerate–Severe
EncephalopathyNoneGrade I–IIGrade III–IV

The Golden Rule: Child-Pugh classifies chronic hepatic reserve — not acute illness. Score at baseline, interpret in context, and pair with the MELD score for transplant and allocation decisions.

Disclaimer & References

Disclaimer

For Educational Purposes Only. This calculator and the accompanying clinical information are intended as educational tools for healthcare professionals. They do not replace clinical judgement. Results should be interpreted in the full clinical context. Lab reference ranges vary by institution — verify with your own laboratory. Drug dosages should be confirmed against current prescribing information.

References

  1. Child CG, Turcotte JG. Surgery and portal hypertension. In: Child CG, ed. The Liver and Portal Hypertension. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1964:50–64.
  2. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60(8):646–649. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800600817
  3. Durand F, Valla D. Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD. J Hepatol. 2005;42 Suppl(1):S100–S107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.11.015
  4. Kamath PS, Kim WR. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology. 2007;45(3):797–805. DOI: 10.1002/hep.21563
  5. D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006;44(1):217–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.013
  6. Friedman LS. Surgery in the patient with liver disease. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2010;121:192–205. PMCID: PMC2917149
  7. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018;69(2):406–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024
  8. Tsoris A, Marlar CA. Use of the Child Pugh Score in Liver Disease. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: NBK542308